membrane filtration

forbidden words: membrane filtration

This is one of the terms you can’t say in the Trump Regime. See a comprehensive list at the Forbidden Words Project.

membrane filtration

Although the following is an explanation of membrane filtration from a company called LiqTech, it offers a quick definition of membrane filtration and its uses. I have found several definitions and uses in scientific journals that range from 15 pages to 75 pages long. 

What is membrane filtration?

Membrane filtration is a filtration process that removes unwanted particles and contaminants from liquids and gases. The membrane filtration technology is used in many industrial large-scale applications as it enables industries to cost-effectively run cleaner and compliant operations free of harmful particles and contaminants.

In short, membrane filtration methods employ one or more membranes for the filtration process. A membrane is a thin layer of a material that provides a physical barrier to separate molecules and particles of various sizes and characteristics. Even the smallest elements, such as bacteria and viruses, can be rejected by membranes. A membrane can be made of several organic and inorganic materials and constructed in various module designs.

This enables the membrane to filter different types of liquids or gases. Membrane filtration is a pressure-driven technology. No chemicals are added to treat the water and gases. Chemicals are only needed for membrane cleaning to maintain superior hygiene. Thus, it is a clean technology, securing a greener future.

Membranes can either be produced from organic or inorganic materials. Organic membranes are polymer membranes and are mainly used for liquid filtration. A polymer membrane is a semi-permeable filter media made of polymeric materials such as polysulfone, polycarbonate, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyamide, or cellulose acetate. Dive more into polymer membranes here.

An alternative to polymer membranes is ceramic membranes, which can be produced from various inorganic materials. One of the materials is the solid, long-lasting material silicon carbide (SiC). SiC is the second hardest material in the world, and SiC membranes are rapidly emerging as it provides some unique advantages compared to traditional ceramic and polymeric membranes. This is the membrane LiqTech is specialized in. Dive into the details about silicon carbide membranes here.

How do membrane filtration methods work?

Membrane filtration is a simple technique to boost the quality of various types of liquids and gases.

Simply put, a pressure pump applies pressure to force the feed stream through the membrane. This will separate the feed stream into two streams: the permeate and the retentate. The permeate consists of the substances that can pass through the membrane surface. It is either liquid or gases the membranes filter. The retentate consists of rejected particles, which are held back by the membrane surface.

The membrane’s pore size structure defines the size of the particles that are retained. Membranes can be made with various pore sizes. The smaller the pore size, the smaller particles can be retained. This enables filtration processes of different types of liquids and gases. A membrane’s pore size is measured in microns. One micron is equal to one millionth of a meter. This extremely fine measurement is crucial for pore size structures to establish what kinds of particles a membrane can reject. While human hair is approximately 50 microns, bacteria can be as small as 1-10 microns. Thus, micron rating is essential to define what kinds of particles a filter can retain. This also determines for which filtration applications and industries a membrane is useful.

What can membrane filtration be used for?

Membrane filtration methods are one of the solutions to greener industries. Today, many sectors pollute by emitting toxic gases or generating large wastewater streams. Membrane filtration can reduce gaseous pollution and filter wastewater, enabling water reclamation and reuse for other industrial processes, maintenance, or irrigation.

Various industries use membrane filtration methods. Membrane filter techniques are essential in large-scale industrial applications to treat liquids and gases.

Within water treatment, water filter membranes are critical technology behind many water treatment systems. Water filter membranes can be used to treat drinking water and pool and spa environments to control and prevent diseases by removing bacteria, viruses, and pathogens. It can also be used within the food and beverage industry to purify and concentrate liquids. Still, membrane filtration is also employed within arduous industries with aggressive fluids, such as oil and gas, power plants, and marine to remove polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), particulate matter (PM), pathogens, and heavy metals from wastewater. Membranes can comply with even the strictest wastewater discharge limits.

Furthermore, liquid filtration can be used to extract liquid substances, such as acid purification. This means that within wastewater treatment, it is the permeate, which is clean water, which is the product, whereas, within acid filtration, it is the retentate, which is the wanted product.

Within gas treatment, membrane filtration is the lever to various emission technologies. It can be used for diesel particulate filters (DPF) and autocatalysts, ideal for vehicles that produce high soot loads, such as garbage trucks, port vehicles, diesel pick-up trucks, intra-city vehicles, and off-road vehicles.

Advantages of membrane filtration

The advantages of membrane filtration are numerous. Membrane filter techniques are not just good for the environment. They are simply good business.

Membrane filtration provides reliability, consistent filtration results, and constant compliance. With more and more environmental regulations on wastewater treatment and emission reduction set by various national and international regulatory institutions to seek a greener future, reliable and consistent filtration solutions are imperative to obtain constant compliance. Compliance is essential to avoid operational downtime and heavy fines affecting your OPEX.

Moreover, membrane filtration reduces energy consumption compared to other filtration technologies, making it a cost-effective solution. Add to that, once you treat your wastewater, you can optimize your water management and take an active role in protecting scarce resources. Industrial wastewater can be reduced for other industrial processes, maintenance, or sold of irrigation. This ensures reduced OPEX.

There are many more advantages of membrane filtration. At LiqTech, we have more than 20 years of experience developing, producing, and marketing proprietary ceramic membranes for various large-scale industrial applications.

The LiqTech ceramic membranes are ideal for aggressive fluids. See its features and benefits here:

  • pH 0 to 14
  • Abrasion-resistant
  • Temperature: up to 800 ˚C
  • Robustness
  • Low maintenance
  • Long-term performance
  • Unmatched performance

The Filtration Techniques

Within water treatment, there are four membrane techniques separated by the membrane’s selectivity.

The four techniques are:

In short, microfiltration is a filtration process to separate larger suspended solids and micron-sized particles. Microfiltration is an excellent range to use for pretreatment before other filtration applications within nanofiltration or reverse osmosis. 

Ultrafiltration is, like microfiltration, a pressure-driven membrane filtration technique used to treat various types of water and wastewater to remove suspended solids and solutes. UF can, among others, be used to remove bacteria, viruses, colloids, proteins, pyrogens, and pathogens. 

Nanofiltration is a filtration process used to separate low total dissolved solids and particles, such as inorganic salts and small organic molecules.

Reverse osmosis is the finest filtration technique, rejecting dissolves solids like salts and ions. RO is used in drinking water treatment.

from — Membrane filtration. (n.d.). Dive Into Ceramic Membrane Technology. Retrieved May 12, 2026

~ ~ ~ 

Membrane technology

Membrane technology encompasses the scientific processes used in the construction and application of membranes. Membranes are used to facilitate the transport or rejection of substances between mediums, and the mechanical separation of gas and liquid streams. In the simplest case, filtration is achieved when the pores of the membrane are smaller than the diameter of the undesired substance, such as a harmful microorganism. Membrane technology is commonly used in industries such as water treatment, chemical and metal processing, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, the food industry, as well as the removal of environmental pollutants.

After membrane construction, there is a need to characterize the prepared membrane to know more about its parameters, like pore size, function group, material properties, etc., which are difficult to determine in advance. In this process, instruments such as the Scanning Electron Microscope, the Transmission electron Microscope, the Fourier Transform Infrared SpectroscopyX-ray Diffraction, and Liquid–Liquid Displacement Porosimetry are utilized.

Introduction

Membrane technology covers all engineering approaches for the transport of substances between two fractions with the help of semi-permeable membranes. In general, mechanical separation processes for separating gaseous or liquid streams use membrane technology. In recent years, different methods have been used to remove environmental pollutants, like adsorptionoxidation, and membrane separation. Different pollution occurs in the environment like air pollution, waste water pollution etc.[1] As per industry requirement to prevent industrial pollution because more than 70% of environmental pollution occurs due to industries. It is their responsibility to follow government rules of the Air Pollution Control & Prevention Act 1981 to maintain and prevent the harmful chemical release into the environment.[2] Make sure to do prevention & safety processes after that industries are able to release their waste in the environment.[3]

Biomass-based Membrane technology is one of the most promising technologies for use as a pollutants removal weapon because it has low cost, more efficiency, & lack of secondary pollutants.[1]

Typically polysulfonepolyvinylidene fluoride, and polypropylene are used in the membrane preparation process. These membrane materials are non-renewable and non-biodegradable which create harmful environmental pollution.[4][5] Researchers are trying to find a solution to synthesize an eco-friendly membrane which avoids environmental pollution. Synthesis of biodegradable material with the help of naturally available material such as biomass-based membrane synthesis can be used to remove pollutants.[6]

Membrane Overview

Ultrafiltration for a swimming pool

Venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation scheme

Membrane separation processes operate without heating and therefore use less energy than conventional thermal separation processes such as distillationsublimation, or crystallization. The separation process is purely physical and both fractions (permeate and retentate) can be obtained as useful products. Cold separation using membrane technology is widely used in the food technologybiotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Furthermore, using membranes enables separations to take place that would be impossible using thermal separation methods. For example, it is impossible to separate the constituents of azeotropic liquids or solutes which form isomorphic crystals by distillation or recrystallization, but such separations can be achieved using membrane technology. Depending on the type of membrane, selective separation of certain individual substances or substance mixtures is possible. Important technical applications include the production of drinking water by reverse osmosis. In waste water treatment, membrane technology is becoming increasingly important. Ultra/microfiltration can be very effective in removing colloids and macromolecules from wastewater. This is needed if wastewater is discharged into sensitive waters especially those designated for contact water sports and recreation.

About half of the market is in medical applications such as artificial kidneys to remove toxic substances by hemodialysis and as artificial lung for bubble-free supply of oxygen in the blood.

The importance of membrane technology is growing in the field of environmental protection (Nano-Mem-Pro IPPC Database). Even in modern energy recovery techniques, membranes are increasingly used, for example in fuel cells and in osmotic power plants.

Mass transfer

Two basic models can be distinguished for mass transfer through the membrane:

  • the solution-diffusion model and
  • the hydrodynamic model.

In real membranes, these two transport mechanisms certainly occur side by side, especially during ultra-filtration.

Solution-diffusion model

In the solution-diffusion model, transport occurs only by diffusion. The component that needs to be transported must first be dissolved in the membrane. The general approach of the solution-diffusion model is to assume that the chemical potential of the feed and permeate fluids are in equilibrium with the adjacent membrane surfaces such that appropriate expressions for the chemical potential in the fluid and membrane phases can be equated at the solution-membrane interface. This principle is more important for dense membranes without natural pores such as those used for reverse osmosis and in fuel cells. During the filtration process a boundary layer forms on the membrane. This concentration gradient is created by molecules which cannot pass through the membrane. The effect is referred to as concentration polarization and, occurring during the filtration, leads to a reduced trans-membrane flow (flux). Concentration polarization is, in principle, reversible by cleaning the membrane which results in the initial flux being almost totally restored. Using a tangential flow to the membrane (cross-flow filtration) can also minimize concentration polarization.

Hydrodynamic model

Transport through pores – in the simplest case – is done convectively. This requires the size of the pores to be smaller than the diameter of the two separate components. Membranes that function according to this principle are used mainly in micro- and ultrafiltration. They are used to separate macromolecules from solutionscolloids from a dispersion, or remove bacteria. During this process, the retained particles or molecules form a pulpy mass (filter cake) on the membrane, and this blockage of the membrane hampers the filtration. This blockage can be reduced by the use of the cross-flow method (cross-flow filtration). Here, the liquid to be filtered flows along the front of the membrane and is separated by the pressure difference between the front and back of the membrane into retentate (the flowing concentrate) on the front and permeate (filtrate) on the back. The tangential flow on the front creates a shear stress that cracks the filter cake and reduces the fouling.

Membrane operations

According to the driving force of the operation, it is possible to distinguish:

Membrane shapes and flow geometries

Cross-flow geometry

Dead-end geometry

There are two main flow configurations of membrane processes: cross-flow (or tangential flow) and dead-end filtrations. In cross-flow filtration the feed flow is tangential to the surface of the membrane, retentate is removed from the same side further downstream, whereas the permeate flow is tracked on the other side. In dead-end filtration, the direction of the fluid flow is normal to the membrane surface. Both flow geometries offer some advantages and disadvantages. Generally, dead-end filtration is used for feasibility studies on a laboratory scale. The dead-end membranes are relatively easy to fabricate which reduces the cost of the separation process. The dead-end membrane separation process is easy to implement and the process is usually cheaper than cross-flow membrane filtration. The dead-end filtration process is usually a batch-type process, where the filtering solution is loaded (or slowly fed) into the membrane device, which then allows passage of some particles subject to the driving force. The main disadvantage of dead-end filtration is the extensive membrane fouling and concentration polarization. The fouling is usually induced faster at higher driving forces. Membrane fouling and particle retention in a feed solution also builds up a concentration gradients and particle backflow (concentration polarization). The tangential flow devices are more cost and labor-intensive, but they are less susceptible to fouling due to the sweeping effects and high shear rates of the passing flow. The most commonly used synthetic membrane devices (modules) are flat sheets/plates, spiral wounds, and hollow fibers. Flat membranes used in filtration and separation processes can be enhanced with surface patterning, where microscopic structures are introduced to improve performance. These patterns increase surface area, optimize water flow, and reduce fouling, leading to higher permeability and longer membrane lifespan. Research has shown that such modifications can significantly enhance efficiency in water purification, energy applications, and industrial separations.[7]

Flat plates are usually constructed as circular thin flat membrane surfaces to be used in dead-end geometry modules. Spiral wounds are constructed from similar flat membranes but in the form of a “pocket” containing two membrane sheets separated by a highly porous support plate.[8] Several such pockets are then wound around a tube to create a tangential flow geometry and to reduce membrane fouling. Hollow fiber modules consist of an assembly of self-supporting fibers with dense skin separation layers, and a more open matrix helping to withstand pressure gradients and maintain structural integrity.[8] The hollow fiber modules can contain up to 10,000 fibers ranging from 200 to 2500 μm in diameter; The main advantage of hollow fiber modules is the very large surface area within an enclosed volume, increasing the efficiency of the separation process.


Spiral wound membrane module

The Disc tube module uses a cross-flow geometry and consists of a pressure tube and hydraulic discs, which are held by a central tension rod, and membrane cushions that lie between two discs.[9]

Membrane performance and governing equations

The selection of synthetic membranes for a targeted separation process is usually based on few requirements. Membranes have to provide enough mass transfer area to process large amounts of feed stream. The selected membrane has to have high selectivity (rejection) properties for certain particles; it has to resist fouling and to have high mechanical stability. It also needs to be reproducible and to have low manufacturing costs. The main modeling equation for the dead-end filtration at constant pressure drop is represented by Darcy’s law:[8]

dVpdt=Q=Δpμ A(1Rm+R)

where Vp and Q are the volume of the permeate and its volumetric flow rate respectively (proportional to same characteristics of the feed flow), μ is dynamic viscosity of permeating fluid, A is membrane area, Rm and R are the respective resistances of membrane and growing deposit of the foulants. Rm can be interpreted as a membrane resistance to the solvent (water) permeation. This resistance is a membrane intrinsic property and is expected to be fairly constant and independent of the driving force, Δp. R is related to the type of membrane foulant, its concentration in the filtering solution, and the nature of foulant-membrane interactions. Darcy’s law allows for calculation of the membrane area for a targeted separation at given conditions. The solute sieving coefficient is defined by the equation:[8]

S=CpCf

where Cf and Cp are the solute concentrations in feed and permeate respectively. Hydraulic permeability is defined as the inverse of resistance and is represented by the equation:[8]

Lp=JΔp

where J is the permeate flux which is the volumetric flow rate per unit of membrane area. The solute sieving coefficient and hydraulic permeability allow the quick assessment of the synthetic membrane performance.

Membrane separation processes

Membrane separation processes have a very important role in the separation industry. Nevertheless, they were not considered technically important until the mid-1970s. Membrane separation processes differ based on separation mechanisms and size of the separated particles. The widely used membrane processes include microfiltrationultrafiltrationnanofiltrationreverse osmosiselectrolysisdialysiselectrodialysisgas separation, vapor permeation, pervaporation, membrane distillation, and membrane contactors.[10] All processes except for pervaporation involve no phase change. All processes except electrodialysis are pressure driven. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration is widely used in food and beverage processing (beer microfiltration, apple juice ultrafiltration), biotechnological applications and pharmaceutical industry (antibiotic production, protein purification), water purification and wastewater treatment, the microelectronics industry, and others. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes are mainly used for water purification purposes. Dense membranes are utilized for gas separations (removal of CO2 from natural gas, separating N2 from air, organic vapor removal from air or a nitrogen stream) and sometimes in membrane distillation. The later process helps in the separation of azeotropic compositions reducing the costs of distillation processes.

Ranges of membrane based separations

Pore size and selectivity


The pore distribution of a fictitious ultrafiltration membrane with the nominal pore size and the D90

The pore sizes of technical membranes are specified differently depending on the manufacturer. One common distinction is by nominal pore size. It describes the maximum pore size distribution[11] and gives only vague information about the retention capacity of a membrane. The exclusion limit or “cut-off” of the membrane is usually specified in the form of NMWC (nominal molecular weight cut-off, or MWCOmolecular weight cut off, with units in Dalton). It is defined as the minimum molecular weight of a globular molecule that is retained to 90% by the membrane. The cut-off, depending on the method, can by converted to so-called D90, which is then expressed in a metric unit. In practice the MWCO of the membrane should be at least 20% lower than the molecular weight of the molecule that is to be separated.

Using track etched mica membranes[12] Beck and Schultz[13] demonstrated that hindered diffusion of molecules in pores can be described by the Rankin[14] equation.

Filter membranes are divided into four classes according to pore size:

Pore size Molecular mass Process Filtration Removal of
> 10    “Classic” filter    
> 0.1 μm > 5000 kDa microfiltration < 2 bar larger bacteria, yeast, particles
100–2 nm 5–5000 kDa ultrafiltration 1–10 bar bacteria, macromolecules, proteins, larger viruses
2-1 nm 0.1–5 kDa nanofiltration 3–20 bar viruses, 2- valent ions[15]
< 1 nm < 100 Da reverse osmosis 10–80 bar salts, small organic molecules

The form and shape of the membrane pores are highly dependent on the manufacturing process and are often difficult to specify. Therefore, for characterization, test filtrations are carried out and the pore diameter refers to the diameter of the smallest particles which could not pass through the membrane.

The rejection can be determined in various ways and provides an indirect measurement of the pore size. One possibility is the filtration of macromolecules (often dextranpolyethylene glycol or albumin), another is measurement of the cut-off by gel permeation chromatography. These methods are used mainly to measure membranes for ultrafiltration applications. Another testing method is the filtration of particles with defined size and their measurement with a particle sizer or by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). A vivid characterization is to measure the rejection of dextran blue or other colored molecules. The retention of bacteriophage and bacteria, the so-called “bacteria challenge test”, can also provide information about the pore size.

Nominal pore size micro-organism ATCC root number
0.1 μm Acholeplasma laidlawii 23206
0.3 μm Bacillus subtilis spores 82
0.5 μm Pseudomonas diminuta 19146
0.45 μm Serratia marcescens 14756
0.65 μm Lactobacillus brevis  

To determine the pore diameter, physical methods such as porosimeter (mercury, liquid-liquid porosimeter and Bubble Point Test) are also used, but a certain form of the pores (such as cylindrical or concatenated spherical holes) is assumed. Such methods are used for membranes whose pore geometry does not match the ideal, and we get “nominal” pore diameter, which characterizes the membrane, but does not necessarily reflect its actual filtration behavior and selectivity.

The selectivity is highly dependent on the separation process, the composition of the membrane and its electrochemical properties in addition to the pore size. With high selectivity, isotopes can be enriched (uranium enrichment) in nuclear engineering or industrial gases like nitrogen can be recovered (gas separation). Ideally, even racemics can be enriched with a suitable membrane.

When choosing membranes selectivity has priority over a high permeability, as low flows can easily be offset by increasing the filter surface with a modular structure. In gas phase filtration different deposition mechanisms are operative, so that particles having sizes below the pore size of the membrane can be retained as well.

Membrane Classification

Bio-Membrane is classified in two categories, synthetic membrane and natural membrane. synthetic membranes further classified in organic and inorganic membranes. Organic membrane sub classified polymeric membranes and inorganic membrane sub classified ceramic polymers.[16]

Synthesis of Biomass Membrane

The composite biomass membrane

Green membrane or Bio-membrane synthesis is the solution to protected environments which have largely comprehensive performance. Biomass is used in the form of activated carbon nanoparticles, like using cellulose based biomass coconut shell, hazelnut shell, walnut shell, agricultural wastes of corn stalks etc.[5] which improve  surface hydrophilicity, larger pore size, more and lower surface roughness therefore, the separation and anti-fouling performance of membranes are also improved simultaneously.[17]

Fabrication of pure biomass based membrane

A biomass-based membrane is a membrane made from organic materials such as plant fibers.[5] These membranes are often used in water filtration and wastewater treatment applications. The fabrication of a pure biomass-based membrane is a complex process that involves a number of steps. The first step is to create a slurry of the organic materials. This slurry is then cast onto a substrate, such as a glass or metal plate.[18] The cast is then dried, and the resulting membrane is then subjected to a number of treatments, such as chemical or heat treatments, to improve its properties. One of the challenges in the fabrication of biomass-based membranes is to create a membrane with the desired properties.[19]

Equipment and instruments used in the process

List of instruments used in membrane synthesis procedures:

Membrane Characterization

After casting and synthesis of membrane there is need to characterize the prepared membrane to know more details about membrane parameters, like pore size, functional groups, wettability, surface charge, etc. It is important to know membrane properties so we are able to remove and treat a particulate pollutant, which causes pollution in the environment.[20] For characterization following different instruments are used:

Biomass Membrane Applications

Water treatment

Water treatment is any process that improves the quality of water to make it more acceptable for a specific end-use. Membranes can be used to remove particulates from water by either size exclusion or charge separation.[21] In size exclusion, the pores in the membrane are sized such that only particles smaller than the pores can pass through. The pores in the membrane are sized such that only water molecules can pass through, leaving dissolved contaminants behind.[22]

Gas separation

Utilization of membranes in gas separation, like carbon dioxide (CO2), Nitrogen oxides (NO
x
),  Sulphur oxides (SO
x
), harmful gasses can be removed to protect the environment.[23] Biomass Membrane gas separation more effective than commercial membrane.[24]

Hemodialysis

Membrane application in hemodialysis is a process of using a semipermeable membrane to remove waste products and excess fluids from the blood.[25]

See also

from — Wikipedia contributors. (2026a, February 9). Membrane technology. Wikipedia. Retrieved May 12, 2026

~ ~ ~ 

‘Clean water,’ ‘equity,’ ‘microplastics’ and other words banned in leaked USDA memo

Agricultural Research Service sent out a list of 110 terms that can no longer be used.
 

On the day of his inauguration, President Donald Trump claimed his administration would end the “censorship of protected speech.” But actions speak louder than words. Thanks to a leaked email memo, we now know the Trump administration has drawn up a list of 110 words and phrases that have now been banned from use in the Agricultural Research Service (ARS).

ARS is the division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) tasked with providing the agricultural research, education and economic analysis that protects the health of the nation’s farmland, ensures the safety of the food we eat and develops solutions for diseases, disasters and other threats to the food supply. Most recently, it was operating over 600 research projects in 95 locations and had a $1.7 billion budget, which like the words it uses could now be on the chopping block and could significantly hamper the division’s ability to do its job.

The memo was posted on X (formerly Twitter) on March 30 by More Perfect Union, the nonprofit media outlet founded by Faiz Shakir, Bernie Sanders’s 2020 campaign manager. According to Jordan Zakarin, the journalist who broke the news, work at the ARS has largely already been halted due to hiring freezes and employees’ procurement credit cards being throttled.

The memo’s author, Sharon Strickland, an ARS administrator in the USDA’s Northeast Area, wrote to her ARS colleagues in the Research, Education and Economics division: “When evaluating agreements, those entries that include these terms or similar terms cannot be submitted.” She added that such a review will “ensure that we maintain compliance with the Administration’s EOS [executive orders].”

It is unclear from the memo what “evaluating agreements” exactly refers to or why such evaluations are being required. A congressional staffer familiar with the memo, told Barn Raiser that a request for information about what the memo exactly means has been submitted to the USDA, but as of April 2 no response had been received.

Outraged by the memo, Rep. Chellie Pingree (D), a farmer who represents Maine’s 1st Congressional District, posted a scathing video response on her Instagram page. Pingree told Barn Raiser:

It’s not surprising that this Administration would go after anything they deem “woke,” or at all related to climate change. But to target basic terms that are fundamental to agricultural research is beyond the realm of reason. I am sure that everyone—regardless of where they live (or their political party)—wants to have clean and safe drinking water, affordable housing, clean air, and wants to know if there’s PFAS in their soil.

This Administration has been clear in its belief—however malicious and misguided—that climate change isn’t real, and that adopting policies to address it is a waste of money and time. Its attitudes towards climate justice are equally dismissive.

This latest effort is a terrifying look into what this Administration is trying to do: stamp out any and every attempt to create safer, more affordable communities for Americans.

Climate

From his first moments in office, Trump has unilaterally implemented Project 2025’s pro fossil fuel policies. Trump’s pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency Lee Zeldin, the former New York state senator and fossil fuel industry booster, has denigrated climate programs as the “green new scam.” After his confirmation, Zeldin announced sweeping actions to dismantle the Clean Air Act, rescinded the EPA’s 16-year-old determination that greenhouse gases pose a danger and lifted restrictions on toxic air pollutants.

Through DOGE, Trump and Musk have frozen funding for renewable energy and climate related agriculture programs. On March 25 the USDA announced that it would release previously authorized grant funds to farmers and small rural business owners to build renewable energy projects—but only if they rewrite applications to comply with Trump’s Unleashing American Energy Executive Order, which prioritizes fossil fuel production and cuts federal support for renewable energy projects.

The climate-related key terms being banned by the ARS include:

climate, climate change, climate-change, changing climate,  climate consulting, climate models, climate model, climate accountability, climate risk, climate resilience, climate smart agriculture, climate smart forestry, climatesmart, climate science, climate variability, global warming, carbon sequestration, GHG emission, GHG monitoring, GHG modeling, carbon emissions mitigation, greenhouse gas emission, methane emissions, green infrastructure, sustainable construction, carbon pricing, carbon markets

Environment/Housing

This section of the banned word list is divided into 5 subcategories.

Building on the 2023 ruling by the Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA, where the court decided on its own authority, without scientific support, to substantially limit the definition of “waters of the United States” and thus what wetlands deserved protection from pollution, Zeldin’s EPA is taking steps to further undermine the Clean Water Act.

On March 25, at the Environmental Council of the States’ spring meeting, Zeldin touted the agency’s commitment to “cooperative federalism” in the effort to turn over regulatory power to the states. He also said the agency would further revise the definition of “waters of the United States” as well as the regulation of PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” which have polluted farmlands and destroyed the livelihoods of farmers nationwide, leaving the future of the EPA’s first-ever national limits in doubt.

Pollution remediation banned terms

runoff, membrane filtration, microplastics, water pollution, air pollution, soil pollution, groundwater pollution, pollution remediation, pollution abatement, sediment remediation, contaminants of environmental concern, CEC, PFAS, PFOA, PCB, nonpoint source pollution

Water infrastructure banned terms

water collection, water treatment, water storage, water distribution, water management, rural water, agricultural water, water conservation, water efficiency, water quality, clean water, safe drinking water, field drainage, tile drainage

The memo also included key terms for clean transportation, renewable energy sources and other programs related to climate programs under Inflation Reduction Act and the Biden administration’s so-called climate smart programs. This included federal funding to support the construction of solar panels and wind turbines, but also included support for biogas, a controversial source of natural gas billed as a way to offset methane emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) by converting large amounts of animal waste into fuel through anaerobic digesters. Research has shown these digesters are not as leak-proof or environmentally friendly as the industry claims, while critics say these digesters use federal funds to prop up industrial agriculture with technology only exists because of the massive amount of waste created on farms with thousands of heads of livestock.

Clean-energy banned terms

clean power, clean fuel, alternative energy, geothermal, solar energy, solar power, photovoltaic, agrivoltaics, wind power, nuclear energy, nuclear power, bioenergy, biofuel, biogas, biomethane, ethanol, diesel, aviation fuel, pyrolysis, energy conversion

Clean transportation banned terms

electric vehicle, hydrogen vehicle, fuel cell, low-emission vehicle

The USDA operates several rural housing programs through its Rural Housing Service, a division within the agency’s office of Rural Development. Each year, the office of Rural Development provides billions of dollars to small towns, farmers and rural businesses. It is one of the agency’s main tools to promote economic growth in rural America. An estimated 5.6 million rural households—about one-quarter of all rural families—pay more each month for housing than they can afford.

In February, Housing Assistance Council CEO David Lipsetz said in response to reports of extensive cuts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the USDA, “Hundreds of thousands of rural families—many elderly and disabled—live in HUD’s publicly supported housing or rely on HUD and USDA rental programs to find a place they can call home. These public programs sustain rural communities as they cycle through tough times.”

Affordable housing banned terms

affordable housing, affordable home, low-income housing, subsidized housing, transitional housing, housing affordability, housing efficiency, prefabricated housing

DEI

In line with Trump and the GOP’s widespread assault on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, the USDA memo also included a range of key words dealing with race, gender and sexuality and their overlapping connection with values of equitability and social justice.

equity, DEI, DEIA, equitable, inclusive, BIPOC, people of color, disadvantaged, social justice, environmental justice, underserved, underrepresented, justice40, lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, transgender, non-binary, two-spirit, queer, QT, diverse, diversity, inclusion, accessibility, accessible, black, indigenous, asexual, non-conforming, trans, vulnerable, gender, gendered, gender, gendered

from — Perkins, J., & Bleifuss, J. (2026, March 2). ‘Clean water,’ ‘Equity,’ ‘Microplastics’ and other words banned in leaked USDA memo. Barn Raiser


May 12, 2026
Salem, MA

See the complete list at the Forbidden Words Project.

image: water water everywhere . . .  © holly troy .2026


Discover more from holly troy ~ sacred folly

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Unknown's avatar

Posted by

Holly hails from an illustrious lineage of fortune tellers, yogis, folk healers, troubadours and poets of the fine and mystical arts. Shape-shifting Tantric Siren of the Lunar Mysteries, she surfs the ebbs and flows of the multiverse on the Pure Sound of Creation. Her alchemy is Sacred Folly — revolutionary transformation through Love, deep play, Beauty, and music.

One thought on “membrane filtration

Leave a Reply